The second phone interview is to see whether you might be a good fit. They usually do an initial 15-min phone interview to gauge interest, and will often ask if you've ever heard of them (although the recruiter will make it seem like you're an idiot for not having heard of this $8 billion/yr company, it's okay to say you haven't). I haven't yet met an employee who actually applied to work here. McM recruits nearly all its employees, and/or gets them from other employee referrals. Although I call many MT's friends, I cannot accurately speak to THAT specific experience, but rather how I see the company as a whole. It'll be clear from my statements that I'm an average worker here, and not an MT. The MT's (management trainee's) end up just as miserable as the 'average workers', many of whom also graduated from prestigious universities and have master's degrees. Yes, the reviews you've seen are largely correct - with one caveat. I am a current McM employee, working here for several years, and thought I'd chime in. It isn't a challenging interview at all but I have no idea how they pick their candidates. The interview I had was a fit interview and some behavioral questions. They mostly recruited from top schools and thought having a prestigious degree would be the perfect criteria to be awesome at the job. It scared me that I would have to start off as an MT managing a bunch of workers who have worked there for decades despite the fact that I had no experience. I interviewed with McMaster-Carr back in college. Yet, these are the people running the show.

They would be completely useless to any potential customer that walks through the door. Most wouldn't know what a tap looks like or what it's used for. The fresh grad management trainee doesn't know the different between an NP tap, a flatbottom tap, an oversized tap or a standard tap. I also find their reported management style troubling. If their potential customer base would rather go elsewhere, you might consider doing the same. What this means for any potential employees. My boss likes to order material from them when due dates are extremely thin, but they aren't really competitive outside of that. For the most part, I will shop on Ebay or Amazon before going to MMC. Good in a pinch because they are down the street. I take it you did not accept the job, or an offer was not made? So, does anyone know about the management trainee program? Is it much better than the non-manager roles at this company? The most consistent positive I've read on these reviews is that that pay and benefits are stellar.

Rather, it seems that all and advancement opportunities go to the management trainees. They claim that management is oppressive and that there aren't many opportunities for them to advance. Most of the reviews I've read appear to be from these people. Then there are the occupational/non-manager employees, who seem to be a mix of everyone else. There are the managers/management trainees, which appear to be mostly younger people from top-tier colleges. The hierarchical structure of the company seems to be set up in a two-tier system. In a lot of cases, these types of solicitations appear to be phony or for some crappy position.Ģ) The employee reviews on various sites are mostly terrible.

I am concerned for a a couple reasons.ġ) The recruiter contacted me after reviewing my resume on Monster. I have a phone interview with them today. Has anyone worked or known someone that worked for McMaster-Carr? They are a major industrial supplier based in Chicago, with branches throughout the country.

Management development macmaster carr